HackerRank vs HackerEarth
Last Updated:Our analysts compared HackerRank vs HackerEarth based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Technical Assessment Tools, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Products Insights
Our Review
Is HackerRank actually ranking among the top tech assessment platforms? HackerRank is a popular platform for technical assessments, especially for software engineers. It's used by both companies looking to hire and engineers wanting to improve their skills. However, user reviews from the last year reveal a mixed bag. While many appreciate the large question bank, which is helpful for interview prep, some criticisms stand out. For example, many users feel HackerRank's questions are more like abstract puzzles than real-world coding challenges, which can be frustrating and may even reflect poorly on companies using the platform. A recurring complaint centers around the narrow evaluation criteria, which some users find detrimental to the learning process and confusing in terms of defining the "correct" solution. The platform's technical UI functionality also receives mixed reviews, with some users expressing disappointment. Alternatives like LeetCode or Coderbyte are often suggested for those seeking a wider variety of practice problems. Overall, while HackerRank can be a useful tool, it's not without its drawbacks. It seems best suited for those specifically prepping for technical interviews, particularly at companies known to use the platform. However, for those seeking to develop a broader understanding of real-world coding challenges, exploring alternative platforms might be more beneficial.
User reviews from the past year paint a largely positive picture of HackerEarth as a technical assessment tool, particularly for those seeking to unearth top-tier coding talent. Users consistently applaud the platform's expansive and challenging question library, which many find to be a step up from competitors like HackerRank. For instance, one user praised HackerEarth's "versatility of question types," highlighting the availability of coding exercises, descriptive questions, and multiple-choice questions. However, some users have raised concerns about the clarity of certain questions, especially those seemingly crafted by non-native English speakers. This lack of clarity, coupled with what some perceive as stringent time limits, can lead to frustration among candidates. Despite these drawbacks, HackerEarth's robust feature set, including remote proctoring, automatic evaluation, and plagiarism detection, makes it a compelling choice for companies invested in hosting hackathons and coding challenges. Overall, HackerEarth emerges as a powerful ally for organizations looking to streamline their technical recruitment process, particularly those seeking candidates who thrive under pressure and possess advanced coding skills.
Key Features
- CodePair: A real-time collaborative coding environment that allows interviewers to conduct live technical interviews with candidates, complete with video, audio, and chat functionalities.
- Pre-Built Assessments: A library of ready-to-use coding tests and challenges across various domains and difficulty levels, enabling quick setup of assessments.
- Customizable Tests: The ability to create tailored assessments by selecting from a wide range of questions or by adding custom questions to meet specific hiring needs.
- Automated Scoring: Automatic evaluation of code submissions based on predefined test cases, providing instant feedback on candidate performance.
- Plagiarism Detection: Advanced algorithms to detect similarities in code submissions, helping maintain the integrity of the assessment process.
- Comprehensive Coding Assessments: Offers a wide range of coding challenges across various programming languages, including Python, Java, and C++.
- Real-World Problem Simulations: Provides scenarios that mimic real-world technical problems to evaluate candidates' problem-solving skills effectively.
- Customizable Test Creation: Allows recruiters to tailor assessments to specific job roles by selecting relevant questions and difficulty levels.
- Automated Evaluation: Utilizes an automated grading system to provide immediate feedback on code correctness and efficiency.
- Plagiarism Detection: Employs advanced algorithms to detect similarities in code submissions, ensuring the integrity of the assessment process.
Analyst Rating Summary
Analyst Ratings for Functional Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data
Analyst Ratings for Technical Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data
User Sentiment Summary
HackerRank has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 90% when considering 526 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
HackerEarth has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 90% when considering 565 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Awards
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated HackerRank and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Support and Training. HackerRank stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated HackerEarth and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Security and Data Protection. HackerEarth stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Product Assistance
Product Basics
Screenshots
Top Alternatives in Technical Assessment Tools
Coderbyte
CoderPad
CodeSignal
CodeSubmit
Codility
DevSkiller
HackerEarth
iMocha
Mettl
Qualified.io
Head-to-Head Comparison
We’re the employee-owned Austin-based startup democratizing software data so you can make your decisions in an influence-free zone. Our market data is crowdsourced from our user-base of 100,000+ companies.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...
