---
description: Is Saviom the right solution for you? See where it's ranked among all Resource Management Software. Read expert reviews, compare 2026 pricing, and explore top-rated features.
---
[Home](https://www.selecthub.com/) > [Project Management](https://www.selecthub.com/category/project-management/) > [Resource Management Software](https://www.selecthub.com/c/resource-management-software/) > Saviom
Categories:
- [Resource Management Software](https://www.selecthub.com/c/resource-management-software/)
- [PPM Software](https://www.selecthub.com/c/ppm-software/)
- [PSA Software](https://www.selecthub.com/c/psa-software/)
- [Task Management Software](https://www.selecthub.com/c/task-management-software/)
- [Work Management Software](https://www.selecthub.com/c/work-management-software/)
- [Workforce Management Software](https://www.selecthub.com/c/workforce-management-software/)
- ...
## What Is Saviom?
**Industry Specialties:** Serves all industries.
Saviom is a resource management and workforce planning platform built to answer a practical question: who should work on what, when, and at what cost? It helps teams match people to projects based on skills, role, availability, location, and capacity, then spot overbooking, idle time, and hiring gaps before they become expensive problems. It also covers forecasting, project staffing, timesheets, leave, financial tracking, and scenario planning, so managers can test “what if” staffing choices without disturbing live plans.
It fits mid-sized to large organizations best, especially professional services, IT, engineering, consulting, construction, healthcare, and public sector teams that share specialists across many projects. Its appeal is depth: strong multi-dimensional scheduling, detailed utilization views, and demand-vs-capacity planning that feels more precise than lighter planning tools. Users often value the configurable dashboards, real-time visibility, and support for matrix organizations, though the breadth can mean a steeper learning curve at first. Pricing is typically quote-based rather than publicly posted, usually depending on user count, modules, deployment, and contract term, commonly billed annually.
PRICE
$
$
$
$
$
COMPANY SIZE
S
M
L
DEPLOYMENT
PLATFORM
[Try Before You Buy. Request a Free Demo Today!Request Demo It's completely free!](https://pmo.selecthub.com/get-product-demo/?category=Resource+Management+Software&product_name=Saviom&origin_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.selecthub.com%2Fp%2Fresource-management-software%2Fsaviom%2F&product_logo=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.selecthub.com%2Fproducts%2F5460b9ea1986ec386cb64df22dff37be-bcfaffcebce2450a3778460bbab90c28%2Fresources%2Fnormal%2Flogo.png%3F1776713320)
User Sentiment i
![User satisfaction level icon: great]()
Based on 18 reviews:
Add your rating:
![Screenshots]()![Screenshots]()
Product Screenshots and Videos
## #6
Saviom is ranked #6 in the Resource Management Software product directory based on the latest available data collected by SelectHub. Compare the leaders with our In-Depth Report.
[Get the Report Now](https://pmo.selecthub.com/request-custom-scorecard?category_slug=resource-management-software&product_slug=saviom&page_type=product&slug=saviom&product_name=Saviom&category=Resource+Management+Software&origin_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.selecthub.com%2Fp%2Fresource-management-software%2Fsaviom%2F)
## Saviom Pricing
Based on our most recent analysis, Saviom pricing starts in the range of $10 - $100.
[Get Price Quote](https://pmo.selecthub.com/get-product-pricing/?category=Resource+Management+Software&product_name=Saviom&origin_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.selecthub.com%2Fp%2Fresource-management-software%2Fsaviom%2F&product_logo=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.selecthub.com%2Fproducts%2F5460b9ea1986ec386cb64df22dff37be-bcfaffcebce2450a3778460bbab90c28%2Fresources%2Fnormal%2Flogo.png%3F1776713320&price=2)
- Price
-
$
$
$
$
$
i
- Starting From
- Custom Quote
i
- Pricing Model
- Annually, Quote-Based
- Free Trial
- 60 Days - Request for Free
## Training Resources
Saviom is supported with the following types of training:
- Documentation
- In Person
- Live Online
- Videos
- Webinars
## Support
The following support services are available for Saviom:
- Email
- Phone
- Chat
- FAQ
- Forum
- Help Desk
- Knowledge Base
- Tickets
- Training
- 24/7 Live Support
## Saviom Benefits and Insights
Why use Saviom?
### Key differentiators & advantages of Saviom
- **Higher billable utilization:** Saviom helps assign the right people to the right work based on skills, availability, cost, and location, which reduces time spent on the bench and improves the percentage of hours that can be billed to client or revenue-generating work.
- **Fewer scheduling conflicts:** With a consolidated view of allocations, managers can spot double bookings, overloading, and gaps before they disrupt delivery. That means fewer last-minute reshuffles and less risk of key staff being pulled in two directions at once.
- **Better delivery confidence:** When teams can see future capacity against project demand, they can commit to timelines with more evidence behind them. This makes it easier to avoid missed milestones caused by hidden resource shortages.
- **Faster staffing decisions:** Instead of checking multiple spreadsheets or messaging several managers, teams can identify suitable resources more quickly from a central system. In practice, that shortens the time between approved work and productive execution.
- **Stronger workforce planning:** Saviom supports forward-looking capacity planning, so leaders can see where demand will exceed supply weeks or months ahead. That allows earlier hiring, cross-training, or contractor planning rather than reacting after work is already at risk.
- **Improved cost control:** By comparing demand with available capacity and matching work to appropriately priced resources, organizations can reduce unnecessary overtime, expensive emergency contractors, and avoidable staffing imbalance across regions or functions.
- **More effective use of specialized skills:** Scarce experts are often the first to become bottlenecks. Saviom helps identify where niche capabilities are underused or overstretched, making it easier to spread critical expertise across projects without burning out the same people.
- **Clearer portfolio trade-offs:** When all project demand is visible in one place, executives can see which initiatives compete for the same people. That makes prioritization more concrete—for example, delaying a lower-value project instead of weakening three projects at once.
- **Less administrative effort:** Centralized resource and planning data reduces manual consolidation and repeated status chasing. Managers spend less time updating disconnected files and more time solving actual capacity or delivery issues.
- **More reliable forecasting:** Historical and live allocation data can improve planning accuracy for future projects, hiring needs, and utilization targets. Over time, that gives finance, PMO, and operations teams a firmer basis for budgeting and headcount decisions.
- **Greater transparency across teams:** Shared visibility into resource commitments reduces misunderstandings between delivery, sales, and operations. For example, sales can check whether likely work is realistically staffable before promising start dates to a client.
- **Lower risk of burnout and attrition:** Better visibility into over-allocation helps organizations intervene earlier when people are consistently loaded beyond reasonable limits. Balanced workloads generally support healthier teams and reduce the operational cost of replacing experienced staff.
### Industry Expertise
Saviom demonstrates broad cross-industry expertise rather than deep specialization in a single vertical, with notable relevance in project-driven environments such as IT services, engineering, consulting, construction, and professional services. It is generally best suited for mid-sized to large organizations, PMOs, and enterprise teams that need structured oversight of people and capacity across multiple departments, regions, or complex portfolios.
## Saviom Reviews
Based on our most recent analysis, Saviom reviews indicate a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 84% based on 18 user reviews from 1 recognized software review sites.
![User satisfaction level icon: great]()
18 reviews
84%
of users would recommend this product
### Synopsis of User Ratings and Reviews
Based on an aggregate of Saviom reviews taken from the sources above, the following pros & cons have been curated by a SelectHub Market Analyst.
#### Pros
- **Cross-team visibility:** Users often praise Saviom for giving one place to see who is available, overbooked, or underused across projects, departments, and locations. That makes it easier to spot conflicts before they turn into missed deadlines.
- **Scenario planning:** Reviewers regularly like the what-if planning tools, especially for testing staffing options before committing people to work. Teams can compare different allocation plans much like moving pieces on a scheduling board before locking the roster.
- **Strong capacity forecasting:** Many users call out forward-looking capacity views as useful for identifying upcoming skill gaps, hiring needs, or bench time. This is particularly valued in project-based environments with changing demand.
- **Detailed resource matching:** Users frequently mention being able to search by skills, role, experience, cost rate, or location. That helps managers assign the right person to the job instead of relying on whoever appears free.
- **Customizable reporting:** Reviews commonly highlight flexible reports and dashboards for utilization, allocations, and demand versus capacity. Teams like being able to tailor outputs for executives, PMs, and resource managers without rebuilding data manually.
#### Cons
- **Steep setup effort:** Users often say Saviom needs significant upfront configuration for roles, rates, calendars, and approval rules before reports and capacity views are reliable. Teams wanting a quicker “plug in and go” rollout can find implementation heavier than expected.
- **Dated interface:** Reviewers regularly describe the UI as functional but not especially intuitive. Common pain points include dense screens, extra clicks to reach common actions, and a learning curve for managers who only use the system occasionally.
- **Reporting takes know-how:** While reporting is a strength, some users note that building tailored views or executive-ready reports can require admin support. In practice, that means simple questions like bench time by skill or future over-allocation are not always self-serve.
- **Integration work can be manual:** Users mention that connecting Saviom cleanly with HRIS, PSA, ERP, or project tools may require custom work or ongoing maintenance, especially when syncing resource data, leave, and financial fields.
- **Limited ease for casual users:** For organizations where team leads just need lightweight scheduling, Saviom can feel like using a control tower to book a meeting room—powerful, but more system than they need day to day.
#### Researcher's Summary:
Recent user sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. Reviewers consistently describe Saviom as stronger than many lightweight scheduling tools and less rigid than some ERP-based options because it handles capacity planning, multi-project allocation, leave, and forecasting in one place. Users often call out the heat maps, real-time utilization views, and configurable reports as practical differentiators, not window dressing. That matters because teams can spot overbooked specialists, bench time, or skill gaps before a project slips. Several reviews also praise scenario planning and custom fields, noting they can model future demand or match people by skill, role, location, or cost rate more precisely than basic PM tools. Compared with alternatives such as spreadsheets, Microsoft Project-style planning, or generic PSA platforms, users say Saviom gives a clearer cross-functional picture of who is available and when.
The weak spots are fairly specific. Some users say the interface looks dated, setup takes effort, and report configuration has a learning curve. A few note that the breadth of features can feel heavy for smaller teams that only need simple task tracking. Those criticisms matter because the product’s value shows up after process design and data discipline; if the organization will not maintain calendars, roles, and forecasts, the system can feel like overkill. Even so, users tend to view those drawbacks as tradeoffs for depth rather than dealbreakers.
Saviom appears best suited to mid-sized and large professional services firms, IT organizations, engineering groups, and PMOs managing shared people across many concurrent projects. In that environment, its main edge is operational control: better forecasting, fewer allocation clashes, and more credible hiring or subcontracting decisions. For companies graduating from spreadsheets and needing portfolio-level resource visibility, users suggest Saviom is a safe bet.
## Key Features
Notable Saviom features include:
- **Enterprise resource scheduling:** Saviom provides a centralized scheduler for assigning people, roles, and non-human resources across projects, BAU work, and departments, with views by day, week, month, or custom horizon.
- **Multi-dimensional resource visibility:** The platform tracks availability, capacity, utilization, skills, qualifications, cost rates, and locations in one system, so managers can filter for a specific mix such as “Java developer in Sydney available at 50% next month.”
- **Resource forecasting:** Saviom supports forward-looking demand and capacity planning, letting teams compare pipeline work, confirmed projects, and existing supply to identify shortages or excess capacity before schedules are locked.
- **Real-time utilization reporting:** It includes configurable utilization views and reports for billable, strategic, and non-project work, making it possible to inspect under- or over-allocation at individual, team, or portfolio level.
- **What-if scenario modeling:** Managers can create and compare planning scenarios—for example, delaying one project, hiring contractors, or shifting work between regions—without overwriting the live plan.
- **Heatmaps and visual dashboards:** Color-coded views highlight overbooked resources, bench time, and demand gaps directly in the schedule, which helps planners spot conflicts without digging through multiple reports.
- **Multi-resource and role-based bookings:** Work can be assigned to named individuals or generic roles first, then replaced later with actual people once staffing decisions are finalized.
- **Timesheets and actuals capture:** Saviom includes timesheet functionality so organizations can compare planned versus actual effort, update forecasts, and feed utilization and cost reporting with current data.
- **Financial and cost tracking:** The software supports charge-out rates, cost rates, and financial reporting tied to resource allocations, allowing project and portfolio views that connect staffing decisions to labor cost data.
- **Custom fields and configurable workflows:** Organizations can tailor data structures, forms, labels, and approval steps to reflect internal planning rules, such as business unit codes, competency levels, or resource request stages.
- **Portfolio-level reporting:** Saviom provides consolidated reporting across projects, programs, and business units, including capacity versus demand, utilization summaries, and resource movement across the portfolio.
- **Integration options:** It can integrate with systems such as project management, ERP, HR, and collaboration platforms, helping synchronize resource data, staffing requests, and actuals across the wider toolset.
- **Support for matrix organizations:** The platform is built to handle shared resources across departments and geographies, where one person may report to a functional manager while working on several project teams at once.
- **Non-human resource management:** In addition to people, Saviom can schedule assets such as rooms, equipment, and other constrained resources alongside project work in the same planning environment.
## Compare Resource Management Software
These are the top products most often compared.
Generating Scorecard... Compare to Saviom
You can choose 4 products to compare
[![Productive.io product logo]() Productive.io](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/productive-io/)
[![Scoro product logo]() Scoro](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/scoro/)
[![Mosaic product logo]() Mosaic](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/mosaic-app/)
[![Kantata product logo]() Kantata](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/kantata/)
[![Float.com product logo]() Float.com](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/float-com/)
[![Resource Guru product logo]() Resource Guru](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/resource-guru/)
[![Resource Flow product logo]() Resource Flow](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/resource-flow/)
[![Projectworks product logo]() Projectworks](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/projectworks/)
[![Epicflow product logo]() Epicflow](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/epicflow/)
[![Runn product logo]() Runn](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/runn/)
Generating Scorecard... Compare to Saviom
## Similar Products
Here are the most similar products to Saviom.
[![Retain product logo]() Retain](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/retain-resource-planning/)
[![Epicflow product logo]() Epicflow](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/epicflow/)
[![Dayshape product logo]() Dayshape](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/dayshape/)
[![Mosaic product logo]() Mosaic](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/mosaic-app/)
[![Resource Flow product logo]() Resource Flow](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/resource-flow/)
[![Float.com product logo]() Float.com](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/float-com/)
[![Teambook product logo]() Teambook](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/teambook/)
[![Tempus Resource product logo]() Tempus Resource](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/tempus-resource/)
[![eResource Scheduler product logo]() eResource Scheduler](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/eresource-scheduler/)
[![Teamdeck product logo]() Teamdeck](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/teamdeck/)
Your review has been submitted
and should be visible within 24 hours.
Review Title
Pros
Cons
Overall feedback
Your name
Your job title
Industry
Choose your main industry
- Accounting / CPA
- Advertising
- Aerospace & Defense
- Agriculture
- Apparel
- Architecture
- Auto Dealership
- Automotive
- Banking & Financial Services
- Banking & Mortgage
- Chemicals
- Construction & Engineering
- Construction / Contracting
- Consulting
- Consumer Products
- Distribution
- E-commerce
- Education
- Electronics
- Energy & Utilities
- Federal Government
- Field Maintenance
- Food & Beverage
- Healthcare / Social Services
- Hospitality / Gaming / Travel
- Human Resources
- Industrial Machinery
- Information Technology & High Tech
- Insurance
- Legal
- Maintenance / Field Service
- Manufacturing
- Marketing Services
- Media & Communications / Entertainment
- Mill Products
- Mining / Metals
- Mortgage
- Non-Profit
- Not Available
- Oil & Gas
- Other
- Other Services
- Payroll Provider
- Pharmaceuticals
- Professional Employer Organization
- Professional Services
- Property Management
- Public Sector
- Real Estate
- Recruiting Agency
- Religious Institutions
- Retail
- Sales & Marketing
- Semiconductors
- Software / IT
- Sports and Recreation
- Staffing Agency
- State & Local Government
- Telecommunications
- Third-Party Administrator
- Transportation & Logistics
- Wholesale Distribution
Company Size
Choose your company size
- 1 employee
- 2 to 9 employees
- 10 - 19 employees
- 20 - 49 employees
- 50 - 99 employees
- 100 - 499 employee
- 500 - 999 employees
- 1,000 - 2,499 employees
- 2,500 - 4,999 employees
- 5,000 - 9,999 employees
- 10,000 - 24,999 employees
- 25,000 - 49,999 employees
- 50,000 + employees
```json
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"name": "Home",
"item": "https://www.selecthub.com/"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"name": "Project Management",
"item": "https://www.selecthub.com/category/project-management/"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 3,
"name": "Resource Management Software",
"item": "https://www.selecthub.com/c/resource-management-software/"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 4,
"name": "Saviom"
}
]
}
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "SoftwareApplication",
"name": "Saviom",
"description": "
Saviom is a resource management and workforce planning platform built to answer a practical question: who should work on what, when, and at what cost? It helps teams match people to projects based on skills, role, availability, location, and capacity, then spot overbooking, idle time, and hiring gaps before they become expensive problems. It also covers forecasting, project staffing, timesheets, leave, financial tracking, and scenario planning, so managers can test “what if” staffing choices without disturbing live plans.
It fits mid-sized to large organizations best, especially professional services, IT, engineering, consulting, construction, healthcare, and public sector teams that share specialists across many projects. Its appeal is depth: strong multi-dimensional scheduling, detailed utilization views, and demand-vs-capacity planning that feels more precise than lighter planning tools. Users often value the configurable dashboards, real-time visibility, and support for matrix organizations, though the breadth can mean a steeper learning curve at first. Pricing is typically quote-based rather than publicly posted, usually depending on user count, modules, deployment, and contract term, commonly billed annually.
",
"review": {
"@type": "Review","reviewRating": {
"@type": "Rating",
"ratingValue": 69,
"bestRating": 100
},
"author": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Kriti Sahay",
"reviewBody": "Recent user sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. Reviewers consistently describe Saviom as stronger than many lightweight scheduling tools and less rigid than some ERP-based options because it handles capacity planning, multi-project allocation, leave, and forecasting in one place. Users often call out the heat maps, real-time utilization views, and configurable reports as practical differentiators, not window dressing. That matters because teams can spot overbooked specialists, bench time, or skill gaps before a project slips. Several reviews also praise scenario planning and custom fields, noting they can model future demand or match people by skill, role, location, or cost rate more precisely than basic PM tools. Compared with alternatives such as spreadsheets, Microsoft Project-style planning, or generic PSA platforms, users say Saviom gives a clearer cross-functional picture of who is available and when.The weak spots are fairly specific. Some users say the interface looks dated, setup takes effort, and report configuration has a learning curve. A few note that the breadth of features can feel heavy for smaller teams that only need simple task tracking. Those criticisms matter because the product’s value shows up after process design and data discipline; if the organization will not maintain calendars, roles, and forecasts, the system can feel like overkill. Even so, users tend to view those drawbacks as tradeoffs for depth rather than dealbreakers.Saviom appears best suited to mid-sized and large professional services firms, IT organizations, engineering groups, and PMOs managing shared people across many concurrent projects. In that environment, its main edge is operational control: better forecasting, fewer allocation clashes, and more credible hiring or subcontracting decisions. For companies graduating from spreadsheets and needing portfolio-level resource visibility, users suggest Saviom is a safe bet."
}
},
"image": "https://cdn.selecthub.com/products/5460b9ea1986ec386cb64df22dff37be-bcfaffcebce2450a3778460bbab90c28/resources/normal/logo.png?1776713320",
"aggregateRating": {
"@type": "AggregateRating",
"ratingValue": "84",
"bestRating": "100",
"worstRating": "1",
"ratingCount": "18"
},
"positiveNotes": {
"@type": "ItemList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"name": "Cross-team visibility: Users often praise Saviom for giving one place to see who is available, overbooked, or underused across projects, departments, and locations. That makes it easier to spot conflicts before they turn into missed deadlines."
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"name": "Scenario planning: Reviewers regularly like the what-if planning tools, especially for testing staffing options before committing people to work. Teams can compare different allocation plans much like moving pieces on a scheduling board before locking the roster."
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 3,
"name": "Strong capacity forecasting: Many users call out forward-looking capacity views as useful for identifying upcoming skill gaps, hiring needs, or bench time. This is particularly valued in project-based environments with changing demand."
}
]
},
"negativeNotes": {
"@type": "ItemList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"name": "Steep setup effort: Users often say Saviom needs significant upfront configuration for roles, rates, calendars, and approval rules before reports and capacity views are reliable. Teams wanting a quicker “plug in and go” rollout can find implementation heavier than expected."
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"name": "Dated interface: Reviewers regularly describe the UI as functional but not especially intuitive. Common pain points include dense screens, extra clicks to reach common actions, and a learning curve for managers who only use the system occasionally."
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 3,
"name": "Reporting takes know-how: While reporting is a strength, some users note that building tailored views or executive-ready reports can require admin support. In practice, that means simple questions like bench time by skill or future over-allocation are not always self-serve."
}
]
},
"applicationCategory": "Resource Management Software"
}
```
