[Home](https://www.selecthub.com/) \> [Project Management](https://www.selecthub.com/category/project-management/) \> [Resource Management Software](https://www.selecthub.com/c/resource-management-software/) \> Float.com Categories: * [Resource Management Software](https://www.selecthub.com/c/resource-management-software/) * [...](#) ## What Is Float.com? **Industry Specialties:** Professional services Float is a resource management platform that helps teams schedule people, plan capacity, and track workloads with real-time visibility across projects and teams. Here’s what you need to know: | **Best For** | Resource and capacity planning for professional services teams that manage multiple projects and want clear views into team availability and workload. | | ---------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Not Ideal For** | Teams needing advanced project management, complex workflows, and enterprise-level permissions. | | **Competitive Edge** | Real-time capacity and workload visibility. AI Smart Assign for staffing. Partial timeline shift. | | **Integrations** | Project management systems ([Jira](https://www.selecthub.com/p/project-management-software/jira/), [Asana](https://www.selecthub.com/p/project-management-software/asana/)). Calendar tools (Google Calendar, [Outlook](https://www.selecthub.com/p/email-management-software/outlook/)). [Zapier](https://www.selecthub.com/p/ipaas-solutions/zapier/) and API access. | | **Price** | $7/user/month (Starter), $12/user/month (Pro), Enterprise pricing available, 30-day free trial included. | | **Key Features** | Project previews for capacity testing. People tags for skill-based matching. Heatmaps for utilization tracking. | | **Biggest Downsides** | Limited reporting depth. Lightweight time tracking. Permissions may not scale for complex orgs. | | **Alternatives to Consider** | [Mosaic](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/mosaic-app/): Mobile capabilities and capacity and utilization management. [Productive.io](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/productive-io/): Financial management and integrations. | | **Verdict** | Float is ideal for teams needing lightweight resource scheduling and capacity planning. It’s not the best fit for projects that rely on start-to-end task dependencies or customizable reporting. | **My Research Approach for Float** I signed up for the free trial and tested Float over three days, creating projects, adding people, scheduling tasks, and generating utilization reports. I also used the data on our selection platform to compare Float with the top four resource scheduling platforms on our leaderboard: Productive.io, [Scoro](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/scoro/), [Kantata](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/kantata/), and Mosaic. I also watched tutorial videos on the vendor’s YouTube page to get acquainted with the platform before taking it for the test run. To round out my process, I checked out recent online reviews to understand what users like about the platform and what they don’t. PRICE $ $ $ $ $ COMPANY SIZE S M L DEPLOYMENT PLATFORM [ Try Before You Buy. Request a Free Demo Today! Request Demo It's completely free! ](https://pmo.selecthub.com/get-product-demo/?category=Resource+Management+Software&product%5Fname=Float.com&origin%5Furl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.selecthub.com%2Fp%2Fresource-management-software%2Ffloat-com%2F&product%5Flogo=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.selecthub.com%2Fproducts%2Fd83de59e10227072a9c034ce10029c39-c89ec92ef0c3fb9dfc78ad1edd54cd0e%2Fresources%2Fnormal%2Flogo.png%3F1772716797) [Contributors](#view-contributors) ![Ritinder Kaur]() Written by Ritinder Kaur Senior Technical Content Writer [Read Bio ](https://www.selecthub.com/author/ritinder-kaur/) ![Zachary Totah]() Edited by Zachary Totah Content Editor [Read Bio ](https://www.selecthub.com/author/zachary-totah/) User Sentiment i ![User satisfaction level icon: great]() Based on 3652 reviews: Add your rating: ![Screenshots]()![Screenshots]()![Screenshots]()![Screenshots]()![Screenshots]()![Screenshots]()![Screenshots]() Product Screenshots and Videos ## #5 Float.com is ranked #5 on the top 10 Resource Management Software leaderboard based on a comprehensive analysis performed by SelectHub research analysts. Compare the leaders with our In-Depth Report. [Get the Report Now ](https://pmo.selecthub.com/request-custom-scorecard?category%5Fslug=resource-management-software&product%5Fslug=float-com&page%5Ftype=product&slug=float-com&product%5Fname=Float.com&category=Resource+Management+Software&origin%5Furl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.selecthub.com%2Fp%2Fresource-management-software%2Ffloat-com%2F) ## Float.com Pricing Based on our most recent analysis, Float.com pricing starts at $7 (Per Scheduled Person, Monthly (if Paying Annually)). [Get Price Quote](https://pmo.selecthub.com/get-product-pricing/?category=Resource+Management+Software&product%5Fname=Float.com&origin%5Furl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.selecthub.com%2Fp%2Fresource-management-software%2Ffloat-com%2F&product%5Flogo=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.selecthub.com%2Fproducts%2Fd83de59e10227072a9c034ce10029c39-c89ec92ef0c3fb9dfc78ad1edd54cd0e%2Fresources%2Fnormal%2Flogo.png%3F1772716797&price=1) Price $ $ $ $ $ i Starting From $7 Pricing Model Per Scheduled Person, Monthly (if paying annually) Free Trial 30 Days - [Request for Free](https://pmo.selecthub.com/free-trial/?product%5Fname=Float.com&category=Resource+Management+Software&product%5Flogo=https://cdn.selecthub.com/products/d83de59e10227072a9c034ce10029c39-c89ec92ef0c3fb9dfc78ad1edd54cd0e/resources/normal/logo.png?1772716797) ## Training Resources Float.com is supported with the following types of training: Documentation In Person Live Online Videos Webinars ## Support The following support services are available for Float.com: Email Phone Chat FAQ Forum Help Desk Knowledge Base Tickets Training 24/7 Live Support ## Float.com Benefits and Insights Why use Float.com? ### Key differentiators & advantages of Float.com * **Profit Margin Tracking:** Float earned a score of 100 for financial management in our analysis, providing visibility into budget, costs, and margins without turning resource planning into a heavy PSA implementation. The platform also supports cost forecasting out of the box, which Mosaic (85) doesn’t. * **Estimation and Financial Planning:** You can add cost and bill rates by role or person, then link them to scheduled work, giving you a clearer view of what a project may cost before you commit resources. * **Smart Staffing:** Float’s Smart Assign uses machine learning to recommend the best?fit person based on role, skills, seniority, and availability, then provides those suggestions directly in the project?plan view. * **Executive Visibility:** The Project Finance and People Ops dashboards are built off of Float data — rates, actual vs. planned, and margin by project data from Float — which ties tightly to resource-scheduling workflows. It gives Finance and Ops shared, editable views to intervene in time before projects go off track. ### Industry Expertise Float serves creative agencies, in-house production teams, industrial and manufacturing ops, professional services providers, consulting firms, and tech companies. ## Float.com Reviews Based on our most recent analysis, Float.com reviews indicate a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 88% based on 3652 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites. ![User satisfaction level icon: great]() 3652 reviews 88% of users would recommend this product ### Synopsis of User Ratings and Reviews Based on an aggregate of Float.com reviews taken from the sources above, the following pros & cons have been curated by a SelectHub Market Analyst. #### Pros * **Simple Resource Scheduling:** Users praised Float for making scheduling, bookings and resource allocation straightforward. * **Clear Capacity Visibility:** Users liked being able to see who’s available, who’s at capacity and where work is assigned. * **Fast Visual Planning:** A majority of reviews praised Float for its visual, hands-on scheduling experience that saves time compared to manual planning. * **Easier Capacity Forecasting:** Users say Float helps them track time usage and future capacity without relying on spreadsheets. #### Cons * **Shallow Reporting:** Users say reporting and analytics can feel surface-level, especially when they need deeper project profitability or time-tracking breakdowns. * **Basic Time Tracking:** Some users say time-entry edits, time-tracking breakdowns and missing integrations make it less complete for detailed time analysis. * **Limited Permission Controls:** Larger teams may find user roles and permissions too limited or confusing for more complex team structures. * **Operational Friction:** Recent reviewers say deeper reporting can require exports or extra analysis, while others mention view-specific actions and occasional mobile schedule friction that can interrupt day-to-day use. #### Researcher's Summary: Float is best suited for creative agencies, consultancies, studios and internal service teams managing people across multiple projects. It works especially well when weekly planning, utilization, and bench visibility are daily pain points. Our analysts gave Float a perfect score for people and role management, which tracks with my trial experience. The level of control it gave me for managing full-time and part-time employees, time-off policies, and schedules was impressive. I could see who was working on what, their availability, and how my allocations lined up against resource demand. User reviews also praise Float for this visibility, pointing to easy user tools like the drag-and-drop timeline, clear allocation bars, and quick what-if rescheduling. I found the color-coded warnings when flagging overbooked team members non-intrusive, yet effective. That visibility translates to real-life use cases, like the [Atlassian](https://www.float.com/customers/atlassian) creative production team. They increased on-time delivery to 90% after using Float to manage resourcing more consistently. I appreciated the time and capacity-based reports, and exporting to Excel gave me more flexibility to deep dive into utilization numbers. However, reviews say that users want deeper breakdowns for project profitability, time tracking and staffing trends. Based on my testing, I agree. Float’s newer Finance and People dashboards help extend its value beyond basic schedule reporting, but they don’t fully turn it into a finance-grade reporting tool. Float also stays focused on scheduling, working alongside project management tools like Asana, Jira, and [ClickUp](https://www.selecthub.com/p/project-management-software/clickup/) to give you specialized resource planning. And if you want to connect Float further, you can integrate it with thousands of apps through Zapier. Its bidirectional Google Calendar sync impressed me during testing, though Float imported everything as an event, including my PTO, which required some manual cleanup on my end. Overall, Float is a strong fit for operations and delivery leads who need clear resource scheduling, capacity planning and budget visibility without replacing their project management stack. If you need deeper PSA-style reporting, stronger HR workflows or more advanced time analysis, tools like Kantata, Mosaic or Productive may be better fits. ## Key Features * **Interactive Scheduling:** Float lets you schedule and adjust your team’s work with real-time visibility into their availability and instant alerts for overlapping assignments or overtime. * **Project Previews & Heatmaps:** Draft schedules in **Tentative** status to test capacity scenarios and timelines before publishing. View team capacity as % of utilization with color-coded heatmaps and over-capacity tooltips. * **People Tags:** You can assign tags to people — developer, designer, project manager — based on their skills and qualifications, making it easier to find talent for specialist tasks. * **Float MCP:** Get AI-powered conversational analytics within Float — you can ask ChatGPT or Claude who is over capacity, who has availability next week, or which departments are tracking over budget and take appropriate action. * **Time Off Groups:** You can bundle leave types by region, tenure, role, and employment type. These time-off groups appear as drop-down options when you’re creating people profiles. Simply click on the applicable groups to apply leave policies for each member. * **Mobile App:** The Float app is available on iOS and Android devices. You can view and update team schedules, log time, and manage project tasks from anywhere. * **Integrations:** Float connects with your CRM, ERP, finance, and project management tools, including Jira, Asana, ClickUp, Slack, HubSpot, and Karbon. For tools not directly supported, Zapier and the Float API extend connectivity further. * **Public API:** Float offers a public API for programmatic access to third-party and in-house applications for creating, importing, updating, and managing project and people data. ## See It In Action: Building a Resource Plan for a Marketing Team I built a sample resource plan for a marketing team to test Float’s core resource management workflows: team setup, project scheduling, capacity planning, utilization reporting, and Google calendar syncing. **Team Setup and Availability** I started by adding members with different roles, departments, rights, and working hours. Float let me add people individually or import them through a CSV. I used the CSV option, and once I filled out the template, the upload was straightforward. ![CSV Import](https://www.selecthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/CSV-import.jpg) For open roles, I could create placeholders like “Designer” or “Developer,” assign work to them, and later replace the placeholder with a real person. That makes Float useful for planning against future demand, not just current headcount. I also liked how much control Float gives you over availability. I could set custom working hours for freelancers and part-time employees, including people who don’t work certain days. ![Work-Hours-Setup](https://www.selecthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Work-Hours-Setup.jpg) When I added vacation, sick leave, public holidays and reduced workweeks, Float recalculated capacity around unavailable time, so I wasn’t accidentally planning work for people who were off. ![Time Off Policies](https://www.selecthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Time-Off-Policies.jpg) **Project Planning and Allocation** After creating a project, there were multiple ways I could add people – either via the **People** or the **Project** tab on the left pane. It’s quite convenient for a first-time user trying to find their way around the application. Float also offers quite a few project templates to take the grunt work out of scheduling. I liked that I could see who had capacity in hours and percentage and assign work on the same screen. As I added tasks, each person’s utilization changed in real time. When I adjusted someone’s weekly hours, Float recalculated their availability correctly, which made the plan feel more realistic. ![New Project](https://www.selecthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/New-Project.jpg) The budget calculations also stood out. Because I had added cost and bill rates for each person, Float updated the project budget as I assigned work across different phases. That gave me a clearer view of staffing cost while I was still building the schedule. **Schedule Changes and Overbooking** Float made schedule adjustments easy. When I dragged allocations to new dates, dependent tasks moved automatically. The **Date Ranges** feature helped me focus on a specific planning window, while **Partial Timeline Shift** let me move future project phases without changing completed work. If I overbooked a person, Float would highlight the allocation with a red heatmap directly on the schedule. Additionally, it showed the utilization % in red when their capacity exceeded 100%. ![Overtime](https://www.selecthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Overtime.jpg) **Reporting and Utilization** Reporting was useful for basic utilization analysis. I could generate reports for logged and scheduled time, compare logged vs. scheduled hours, and review past logged time against future scheduled work. Filters made the reports more practical. I could break utilization down by person, role, department, project or client, and **Person** tags helped me search for people with specific skills. I could also identify underused and overbooked team members across multiple projects. That said, deeper analysis still depended on exports. The CSV exports were clean, and I could create pivot tables from them, but if you need advanced project profitability or time-tracking analysis, you may still need to do extra work outside Float. ![Pivot Table](https://www.selecthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Pivot-Table.jpg) ## Approach to Common Resource Management Challenges * **Limited Visibility Into Capacity:** Float replaces spreadsheet-based complexity with a live schedule that shows time off, assignments and availability in one view. You can see who’s at capacity, who has room for more work and whether the team can realistically take on another project. * **Skill and Role Mismatches:** Float Smart Assign helps you match tasks to people based on skills, roles and availability. That makes it easier to find the right fit without manually searching employee records or chasing team leads for recommendations. * **Constant Scope and Priority Changes:** Float color-codes schedules by project, so you can quickly see what’s moving, what’s overloaded and where work needs to shift. When priorities change mid-project, you can drag allocations, adjust timelines and rebalance workloads without starting the plan over. * **Siloed Planning Data:** Float connects with project management, calendar and reporting tools, so resource plans don’t sit apart from the rest of your workflow. Instead of updating schedules in one place and tracking work in systems that don’t talk to each other, teams can keep capacity planning closer to day-to-day project execution. ## Cost of Ownership Frequently asked questions regarding Float pricing include: **Q: How is Float.com priced?** **A:** Float’s Starter and Pro plans cost $7 and $12 per scheduled user per month, respectively. You can choose monthly or annual billing. **Q: Is there a free trial, and do I need a credit card to start?** **A:** Yes. Float offers a 30-day free trial of the Pro plan, and you don’t need a credit card to start. When the trial ends, you can downgrade to Starter, stay on Pro, or contact sales to subscribe to Enterprise. Your trial data is preserved regardless of which plan you choose. **Q: What's included in the base plan vs. higher tiers?** **A:** The Starter plan covers core resourcing and capacity management. Pro includes everything in Starter, plus time tracking, project budgeting, and reporting. Enterprise adds advanced permissions, custom onboarding, and dedicated support. **Q: Are there additional costs for integrations with tools like Jira, Slack, or Asana?** **A:** Float includes integrations with these tools in the subscription, so there’s no per-integration fee from Float. However, third-party middleware such as Zapier may carry a separate cost. **Q: How does seat count affect total cost as my team scales?** **A:** Float bills per scheduled user, so costs increase as you add more managed team members. To estimate long-term cost, model your expected team size over the next 12-24 months. **Q: Who counts as a paid seat?** **A:** Only team members added to the schedule count as paid seats. You can add clients or stakeholders as free guests, and they can view the schedule after logging into Float. **Q: What are the hidden costs of Float.com?** **A:** Beyond the subscription, factor in setup time for projects, roles, permissions and reporting views. Larger teams may also need extra admin time, team lead training, consulting support or data migration work if they’re moving from spreadsheets or another scheduling tool. ## Limitations At the time of this review, these are the limitations according to my testing and our analyst data: * I noticed that Float doesn’t show task or milestone progress bars, so if you track completion status visually, you may need to do it in your project management tool. * Float doesn’t generate invoices, so you’ll need to connect it with accounting tools like QuickBooks or Xero for billing workflows. * Float doesn’t support multi-currency budgeting within the same project, which may be limiting if you’re managing projects, rates or costs across regions. ## FAQs Frequently asked questions regarding Float include: **Q: Does Float include time tracking, or is it scheduling only?** **A:** Float includes time tracking on Pro and Enterprise plans. It pre-fills timesheets from scheduled work, so team members can review and confirm their hours instead of starting from a blank timesheet. This makes time tracking easier to maintain, but Float is still better suited for lightweight actuals than deep time analysis or complex billing workflows. **Q: How easy is Float to set up and learn?** **A:** Float is fairly easy to learn because the schedule is visual and the core workflows are lightweight. Basic setup should be manageable for most teams, but larger rollouts will take more admin work, especially if you need to configure roles, permissions, SSO, access rules, compliance requirements or integrations. **Q: Is Float suitable for remote and hybrid teams?** **A:** Yes. Float supports part-time employees, contractors, flexible working hours, time off and regional holidays. You can set each person’s working days, availability and capacity, so schedules reflect when people are actually available instead of assuming everyone works the same hours. ## Compare Resource Management Software These are the top products most often compared. Generating Scorecard... Compare to Float.com You can choose 4 products to compare [ Productive.io ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/productive-io/) [ Scoro ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/scoro/) [ Mosaic ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/mosaic-app/) [ Kantata ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/kantata/) [ Resource Guru ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/resource-guru/) [ Resource Flow ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/resource-flow/) [ Projectworks ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/psa-software/projectworks/) [ Epicflow ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/epicflow/) [ Runn ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/runn/) Generating Scorecard... Compare to Float.com ## Product Case Studies [ pdf Instrument ](https://cdn.selecthub.com/product%5Fcase%5Fstudies/771/study.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAJBPSG65OJTMJV3TQ%2F20260722%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4%5Frequest&X-Amz-Date=20260722T040234Z&X-Amz-Expires=604800&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=cf45dc46b8b0cf68051ac5178043968722962862cc86c7acded005535cdbf5b2) [ pdf Metalab ](https://cdn.selecthub.com/product%5Fcase%5Fstudies/772/study.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAJBPSG65OJTMJV3TQ%2F20260722%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4%5Frequest&X-Amz-Date=20260722T040234Z&X-Amz-Expires=604800&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=6c2b7cfcabf28dae23e19ec8d9c38e959582340915157eb37a6e05bb64b3ebd4) [ pdf Scholz & Friends ](https://cdn.selecthub.com/product%5Fcase%5Fstudies/773/study.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAJBPSG65OJTMJV3TQ%2F20260722%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4%5Frequest&X-Amz-Date=20260722T040234Z&X-Amz-Expires=604800&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=8823cc312ed5229806b6e10e02df20e80bb26e4522a085ccbaec99636e621943) ## Similar Products Here are the most similar products to Float.com. [ Resource Flow ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/resource-flow/) [ Teambook ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/teambook/) [ Teamdeck ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/teamdeck/) [ eResource Scheduler ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/eresource-scheduler/) [ Resource Guru ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/resource-guru/) [ Runn ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/runn/) [ Retain ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/retain-resource-planning/) [ Tempus Resource ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/tempus-resource/) [ Epicflow ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/epicflow/) [ Saviom ](https://www.selecthub.com/p/resource-management-software/saviom/) A note from Float Before we built Float, I worked at ad agencies in New York. I felt the problem before I could properly articulate it. In professional services, time is currency. Every hour is either billed to a client or it isn’t. And yet the systems most teams used to manage that time were a mess of isolated spreadsheets, gut-feel scheduling, and profitability that only became clear after it was too late. People were over-allocated, overwhelmed, and often both at once. In 2011, my co-founder Lars Gelfan and I bonded over Aeropress coffee and a shared frustration: why was planning such a headache, and why did profitability feel like such a mystery? We’d both seen it from the inside. So we built Float. Today, Float is used by over 4,500 agencies, consultancies, and studios worldwide. We connect capacity, scheduling, estimates, and actuals in one place — so the people running the business can see what’s happening while they can still do something about it. Not just see it in a look-back report. We're also one of the rare SaaS companies that's a certified B Corp — part of a community that represents just 3% of software businesses globally. Building Float sustainably matters to us. Your people are your business. You deserve to see clearly. \- Glenn Rogers, CEO, Float ## About the Contributors The following expert team members are responsible for creating, reviewing, and fact checking the accuracy of this content. [ ](https://www.selecthub.com/author/ritinder-kaur/) Written by [Ritinder Kaur](https://www.selecthub.com/author/ritinder-kaur/) Senior Technical Content Writer Ritinder Kaur is a Senior Technical Content Writer at SelectHub and has ten years of experience writing about B2B software and quality assurance. She has a Masters degree in English language and literature and writes about Business Intelligence and Data Science. Her articles on software testing have been published on Stickyminds. [See Full Bio](https://www.selecthub.com/author/ritinder-kaur/) [ ](https://www.selecthub.com/author/zachary-totah/) Edited by [Zachary Totah](https://www.selecthub.com/author/zachary-totah/) Content Editor As SelectHub's Content Manager, Zac is in charge of content across diverse categories including CRM, ERP, HR, medical and project management. He has over 6 years of experience writing and editing for B2B tech and holds a B.A. in communications. His work is driven by his goal of making it less overwhelming for people to find software for their business. [See Full Bio](https://www.selecthub.com/author/zachary-totah/) Your review has been submitted and should be visible within 24 hours. Review Title Pros Cons Overall feedback Your name Your job title Industry [Choose your main industry ](javascript:void%28%29) * [Accounting / CPA](javascript:void%28%29) * [Advertising](javascript:void%28%29) * [Aerospace & Defense](javascript:void%28%29) * [Agriculture](javascript:void%28%29) * [Apparel](javascript:void%28%29) * [Architecture](javascript:void%28%29) * [Auto Dealership](javascript:void%28%29) * [Automotive](javascript:void%28%29) * [Banking & Financial Services](javascript:void%28%29) * [Banking & Mortgage](javascript:void%28%29) * [Chemicals](javascript:void%28%29) * [Construction & Engineering](javascript:void%28%29) * [Construction / Contracting](javascript:void%28%29) * [Consulting](javascript:void%28%29) * [Consumer Products](javascript:void%28%29) * [Distribution](javascript:void%28%29) * [E-commerce](javascript:void%28%29) * [Education](javascript:void%28%29) * [Electronics](javascript:void%28%29) * [Energy & Utilities](javascript:void%28%29) * [Federal Government](javascript:void%28%29) * [Field Maintenance](javascript:void%28%29) * [Food & Beverage](javascript:void%28%29) * [Healthcare / Social Services](javascript:void%28%29) * [Hospitality / Gaming / Travel](javascript:void%28%29) * [Human Resources](javascript:void%28%29) * [Industrial Machinery](javascript:void%28%29) * [Information Technology & High Tech](javascript:void%28%29) * [Insurance](javascript:void%28%29) * [Legal](javascript:void%28%29) * [Maintenance / Field Service](javascript:void%28%29) * [Manufacturing](javascript:void%28%29) * [Marketing Services](javascript:void%28%29) * [Media & Communications / Entertainment](javascript:void%28%29) * [Mill Products](javascript:void%28%29) * [Mining / Metals](javascript:void%28%29) * [Mortgage](javascript:void%28%29) * [Non-Profit](javascript:void%28%29) * [Not Available](javascript:void%28%29) * [Oil & Gas](javascript:void%28%29) * [Other](javascript:void%28%29) * [Other Services](javascript:void%28%29) * [Payroll Provider](javascript:void%28%29) * [Pharmaceuticals](javascript:void%28%29) * [Professional Employer Organization](javascript:void%28%29) * [Professional Services](javascript:void%28%29) * [Property Management](javascript:void%28%29) * [Public Sector](javascript:void%28%29) * [Real Estate](javascript:void%28%29) * [Recruiting Agency](javascript:void%28%29) * [Religious Institutions](javascript:void%28%29) * [Retail](javascript:void%28%29) * [Sales & Marketing](javascript:void%28%29) * [Semiconductors](javascript:void%28%29) * [Software / IT](javascript:void%28%29) * [Sports and Recreation](javascript:void%28%29) * [Staffing Agency](javascript:void%28%29) * [State & Local Government](javascript:void%28%29) * [Telecommunications](javascript:void%28%29) * [Third-Party Administrator](javascript:void%28%29) * [Transportation & Logistics](javascript:void%28%29) * [Wholesale Distribution](javascript:void%28%29) Company Size [Choose your company size ](javascript:void%28%29) * [1 employee](javascript:void%28%29) * [2 to 9 employees](javascript:void%28%29) * [10 - 19 employees](javascript:void%28%29) * [20 - 49 employees](javascript:void%28%29) * [50 - 99 employees](javascript:void%28%29) * [100 - 499 employee](javascript:void%28%29) * [500 - 999 employees](javascript:void%28%29) * [1,000 - 2,499 employees](javascript:void%28%29) * [2,500 - 4,999 employees](javascript:void%28%29) * [5,000 - 9,999 employees](javascript:void%28%29) * [10,000 - 24,999 employees](javascript:void%28%29) * [25,000 - 49,999 employees](javascript:void%28%29) * [50,000 + employees](javascript:void%28%29) ```json { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.selecthub.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Project Management", "item": "https://www.selecthub.com/category/project-management/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Resource Management Software", "item": "https://www.selecthub.com/c/resource-management-software/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "Float.com" } ] } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Float.com", "description": "Float is a resource management platform that helps teams schedule people, plan capacity, and track workloads with real-time visibility across projects and teams. Here’s what you need to know: Best For Resource and capacity planning for professional services teams that manage multiple projects and want clear views into team availability and workload. Not Ideal For Teams needing advanced project management, complex workflows, and enterprise-level permissions. Competitive Edge Real-time capacity and workload visibility. AI Smart Assign for staffing. Partial timeline shift. Integrations Project management systems (Jira, Asana). Calendar tools (Google Calendar, Outlook). Zapier and API access. Price $7/user/month (Starter), $12/user/month (Pro), Enterprise pricing available, 30-day free trial included. Key Features Project previews for capacity testing. People tags for skill-based matching. Heatmaps for utilization tracking. Biggest Downsides Limited reporting depth. Lightweight time tracking. Permissions may not scale for complex orgs. Alternatives to Consider Mosaic: Mobile capabilities and capacity and utilization management. Productive.io: Financial management and integrations. Verdict Float is ideal for teams needing lightweight resource scheduling and capacity planning. It’s not the best fit for projects that rely on start-to-end task dependencies or customizable reporting. My Research Approach for Float I signed up for the free trial and tested Float over three days, creating projects, adding people, scheduling tasks, and generating utilization reports. I also used the data on our selection platform to compare Float with the top four resource scheduling platforms on our leaderboard: Productive.io, Scoro, Kantata, and Mosaic. I also watched tutorial videos on the vendor’s YouTube page to get acquainted with the platform before taking it for the test run. To round out my process, I checked out recent online reviews to understand what users like about the platform and what they don’t.", "review": { "@type": "Review","reviewRating": { "@type": "Rating", "ratingValue": 83, "bestRating": 100 }, "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Kriti Sahay", "reviewBody": "Float is best suited for creative agencies, consultancies, studios and internal service teams managing people across multiple projects. It works especially well when weekly planning, utilization, and bench visibility are daily pain points. Our analysts gave Float a perfect score for people and role management, which tracks with my trial experience. The level of control it gave me for managing full-time and part-time employees, time-off policies, and schedules was impressive. I could see who was working on what, their availability, and how my allocations lined up against resource demand. User reviews also praise Float for this visibility, pointing to easy user tools like the drag-and-drop timeline, clear allocation bars, and quick what-if rescheduling. I found the color-coded warnings when flagging overbooked team members non-intrusive, yet effective. That visibility translates to real-life use cases, like the Atlassian creative production team. They increased on-time delivery to 90% after using Float to manage resourcing more consistently. I appreciated the time and capacity-based reports, and exporting to Excel gave me more flexibility to deep dive into utilization numbers. However, reviews say that users want deeper breakdowns for project profitability, time tracking and staffing trends. Based on my testing, I agree. Float’s newer Finance and People dashboards help extend its value beyond basic schedule reporting, but they don’t fully turn it into a finance-grade reporting tool. Float also stays focused on scheduling, working alongside project management tools like Asana, Jira, and ClickUp to give you specialized resource planning. And if you want to connect Float further, you can integrate it with thousands of apps through Zapier. Its bidirectional Google Calendar sync impressed me during testing, though Float imported everything as an event, including my PTO, which required some manual cleanup on my end.  Overall, Float is a strong fit for operations and delivery leads who need clear resource scheduling, capacity planning and budget visibility without replacing their project management stack. If you need deeper PSA-style reporting, stronger HR workflows or more advanced time analysis, tools like Kantata, Mosaic or Productive may be better fits." } }, "image": "https://cdn.selecthub.com/products/d83de59e10227072a9c034ce10029c39-c89ec92ef0c3fb9dfc78ad1edd54cd0e/resources/normal/logo.png?1772716797", "aggregateRating": { "@type": "AggregateRating", "ratingValue": "88", "bestRating": "100", "worstRating": "1", "ratingCount": "3652" }, "offers": { "@type": "Offer", "priceSpecification": { "@type": "priceSpecification", "price": "7", "priceCurrency": "USD" } }, "positiveNotes": { "@type": "ItemList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Simple Resource Scheduling: Users praised Float for making scheduling, bookings and resource allocation straightforward." }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Clear Capacity Visibility: Users liked being able to see who’s available, who’s at capacity and where work is assigned." }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Fast Visual Planning: A majority of reviews praised Float for its visual, hands-on scheduling experience that saves time compared to manual planning." } ] }, "negativeNotes": { "@type": "ItemList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Shallow Reporting: Users say reporting and analytics can feel surface-level, especially when they need deeper project profitability or time-tracking breakdowns." }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Basic Time Tracking: Some users say time-entry edits, time-tracking breakdowns and missing integrations make it less complete for detailed time analysis." }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Limited Permission Controls: Larger teams may find user roles and permissions too limited or confusing for more complex team structures." } ] }, "applicationCategory": "Resource Management Software" } ```